Reconstructing Lakatos. A reassessment of Lakatos’ philosophical project and debates with Feyerabend in the light of the Lakatos archive

Matteo Motterlini Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 3, pp. 487- 509 - 2002

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

Based on the material in the Lakatos Archive, this paper reconstructs, and then re-assesses, Lakatos’ epistemological project by placing it in the context of the debate on the role of reason in the history of science, and of the justification of rationality as a normative notion. It is claimed that Lakatos’ most fruitful ideas come from a peculiar philosophical combination of Hegelian historicism and Popperian fallibilism. The original tension, however, cannot be ultimately resolved. As a consequence, the problems that Lakatos has to deal with in his attempt to justify a set of genuinely epistemological canons of scientific rationality that are not reducible to psychology or sociology of knowledge stand as a warning for any normative philosophy of science that takes history at its face value.

Download articolo completo:

Share Button